Performance evaluation in content-based image retrieval: overview and proposals

By Henning Müller, W. Müller, D. Squire, Stéphane Marchand-Maillet, Thierry Pun. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2001

658 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Evaluation of retrieval performance is a crucial problem in content-based image retrieval (CBIR). Many different methods for measuring the performance of a system have been created and used by researchers. This article discusses the advantages and shortcomings of the performance measures currently used. Problems such as defining a common image database for performance comparisons and a means of getting relevance judgments (or ground truth) for queries are explained. The relationship between CBIR and information retrieval (IR) is made clear, since IR researchers have decades of experience with the evaluation problem. Many of their solutions can be used for CBIR, despite the differences between the fields. Several methods used in text retrieval are explained. Proposals for performance measures and means of developing a standard test suite for CBIR, similar to that used in IR at the annual Text REtrieval Conference (TREC), are presented.

Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/90c7798c0a1168ff96e68f19e53ec733da74e2ba

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Trevor Darrell
  2. Luc Van Gool
  3. Dacheng Tao
  4. Li Fei-Fei
  5. Xiaogang Wang
  6. Jitendra Malik
  7. Andrew Zisserman
  8. Alan L. Yuille

In Molecular Biology

  1. Thomas Deselaers
  2. Shiv Ram Dubey
  3. Zhi-Hua Zhou
  4. Hermann Ney
  5. Wei-Ying Ma
  6. Guojun Lu
  7. Trevor Darrell
  8. Dengsheng Zhang

Citations in the corpus