Measuring Corruption in Infrastructure: Evidence from Transition and Developing Countries

By Charles Kenny. 2009

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract This paper examines what we can say about the extent and impact of corruption in infrastructure using existing evidence. There is evidence that most perceptions measures appear to be very weak proxies for the actual extent of corruption in the infrastructure sector, largely (but inaccurately) measuring petty rather than grand corruption. Survey evidence is more reliable, but limited as a tool for differentiating countries in terms of access to infrastructure finance or appropriate policy models. The paper suggests that a focus on bribe payments as the indicator of the costs of corruption in infrastructure may be misplaced.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/90c142ca8f1505c1250f11d43c2b32ce1b8d493a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Saixing Zeng
  2. P. Heywood
  3. Stéphane Straub
  4. J. Rose
  5. Sebastian Galiani
  6. F. Weinschelbaum

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. P. Heywood
  2. Stéphane Straub
  3. J. Rose

In Strategy and Management

  1. Saixing Zeng
  2. Vivian W. Y. Tam
  3. P. Heywood
  4. Stéphane Straub
  5. J. Rose

Citations in the corpus