Exploring ‘Quality’: Research Participants’ Perspectives on Verbatim Quotations

By A. Corden, R. Sainsbury. 2006

165 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/90bce39ae45db1f9eca1c3ab5a2fd40c4e87a723

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. R. Allen
2. Karen Kaiser
3. J. Sim
4. J. Wiles
5. J. Waterfield
6. Favourate Sebele Mpofu

In Sociology and Political Science

1. R. Allen
2. J. Wiles
3. Karen Kaiser
4. J. Sim
5. J. Waterfield
6. Favourate Sebele Mpofu

Citations in the corpus

• Focus group methodology: some ethical challenges (2019, background): “1 3 parent’, that might invite negative stereotypes (Corden and Sainsbury 2006).”
• Protecting Respondent Confidentiality in Qualitative Research (2009, background): “Moreover, although little is known about how study participants respond to having their data altered, Corden and Sainsbury (2006) report that respondents have strong feelings about how their words or their personal characteristics are altered in research reports.”
• A rose by any other name: participants choosing research pseudonyms (2016, background): “…prefer to be described in relation to relevant characteristics such as gender and age range (e.g., “man, in 70s”), due to a concern that pretend names might be false, or the real name of somebody else who could then have the comments wrongly attributed to them (Corden & Sainsbury 2006).”