Explaining Homelessness: a Critical Realist Perspective
By S. Fitzpatrick. 2005
249 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Finance, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/90b4896ff4163e41f1a33ef0d5ef35df714210f1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Finance
- M. Aalbers
- G. Bramley
- S. Johnsen
- Brett Christophers
- Desiree Fields
- Jathan Sadowski
- Steffen Wetzstein
- Gertjan Wijburg
In General Health Professions
In Sociology and Political Science
- G. Bramley
- M. Aalbers
- S. Johnsen
- Brett Christophers
- S. Fitzpatrick
- Desiree Fields
- Jathan Sadowski
- Martine August
Citations in the corpus
- Pathways into Multiple Exclusion Homelessness in Seven UK Cities (2013, methodology): “…modelling was informed by the wealth of existing qualitative research on homelessness (see Jones and Pleace, 2010, for a recent summary) and they are indicative of the complex interrelationship between structural, interpersonal and individual causal factors in this area (Fitzpatrick, 2005).”
- Centring Housing in Political Economy (2014, background): “One is the homeless (e.g. Somerville 1992; Fitzpatrick 2005); the other the growing army of live-in domestic servants not only in cities of the Global South but also increasingly in cities such as London and New York (Jelin 1977; Sassen 1996; Lutz 2002), a class whose re-materialization harks back t”
- The homelessness monitor: England 2012 (2013, background): “33 Fitzpatrick, S. (2005) ‘Explaining homelessness: a critical realist perspective’, Housing, Theory & Society, 22(1): 1-17. 34 Stephens, M., et al. (2010) Study on Housing Exclusion: Welfare Policies, Labour Market and Housing Provision.”
- Homelessness in the UK: who is most at risk? (2018, background): “hybrid model provides a more rounded explanation of homelessness than prior polarized positions, but has been argued to be unsatisfying at a deeper, more theoretical level (Fitzpatrick, 2005).”