Delocation and European integration: is structural spending justified?
By K. H. Midelfart-Knarvik, Henry G. Overman. 2002
336 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/90afc62d185b5c3871d35b890e9e7ff783e6b66c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Davide Castellani
- A. Rodríguez‐Pose
- Fulvio Castellacci
- M. Storper
- Bart Verspagen
- Antonello Zanfei
- T. Farole
- J. Fagerberg
In Political Science and International Relations
- A. Rodríguez‐Pose
- M. Storper
- T. Farole
- Fulvio Castellacci
- Bart Verspagen
- J. Bachtler
- Davide Castellani
- Colin Wren
Citations in the corpus
- Evaluation of European Union Cohesion policy: Research questions and policy challenges (2006, methodology): “Regarding the location of economic activity, M idelfart -K narvik and O verman ( 2002 ) concluded that while the Structural Funds expenditure had attracted R&D-intensive industries to the less-favoured regions, this effect had mainly acted counter to regional and national comparative advantage (ex”
- The impact of European Cohesion Policy in urban and rural regions (2017, neutral): “…have stimulated the debate in the field (Boldrin & Canova, 2001; Cappelen, Castellacci, Fagerberg, & Verspagen, 2003; Dall’Erba & Le Gallo, 2008; Ederveen, Gorter, de Mooij, & Nahuis, 2002; Midelfart-Knarvik & Overman, 2002; Percoco, 2013; Rodriguez-Pose & Fratesi, 2004; Sala-i-Martin, 1996).”
- The Impact of EU Regional Support on Growth and Convergence in the European Union (2003, positive): “23 Interestingly, a recent empirical study of the effects of EU regional support on the pattern of specialization of member countries (Midelfart-Knarvik and Overman, 2002), suggests that such support has made the recipient countries and regions better equipped to attract and absorb R&D-intensive ind”
- Location choices of multinational firms in Europe: The role of EU cohesion policy (2008, positive): “As documented by Midelfart-Knarvik and Overman (2002), using sectoral data on regional value added, SF have indeed influenced the location of industry in Europe.”
- Cohesion Policy in the European Union: Growth, Geography, Institutions (2011, positive): “Indeed, comparisons of the economic geography of the EU to that of the US show that Europe has fewer and smaller specialized agglomerations than the US, and many scholars believe this difference enhances the US’ ability to dominate new, innovative sectors of the world economy (Midelfart-Knarvik and ”