Ecopath with Ecosim: methods, capabilities and limitations
By Villy Christensen, Carl J Walters. 2004
1,955 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/909f4731a61b32ae0130225688e7d33b2aa27c51
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Daniel Pauly
- Wwl Cheung
- Villy Christensen
- U. R. Sumaila
- Marta Coll
- R. Watson
- Aaron J. Wirsing
- Michael R. Heithaus
In Global and Planetary Change
- Daniel Pauly
- Wwl Cheung
- Villy Christensen
- U. R. Sumaila
- Marta Coll
- R. Watson
- Carl J Walters
- Elizabeth A. Fulton
Citations in the corpus
- Interesting times: winners, losers, and system shifts under climate change around Australia (2011, background): “Ecospace is an explicitly spatial form of the Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE) modelling approach (Walters et al., 2000; Christensen and Walters, 2004), which uses biomass pools to represent the ecological components of the system.”
- Changes in the northern Benguela ecosystem over three decades: 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s (2004, methodology): “…constructed and analyzed using Ecopath with Ecosim Version 4, called Ecopath hereafter (Christensen and Pauly, 1992, 1995; Christensen et al., 2000; Christensen and Walters, 2004) Ulanowicz (1986)has shown that a greater number of compartments would increase the development capacity of a system,…”
- Vulnerability of seamount fish to fishing: Fuzzy analysis of life-history attributes (2006, methodology): “We used a mass-balanced ecosystem model (Ecopath with Ecosim, see Christensen and Walters, 2004 for details) developed for a theoretical, isolated North Atlantic seamount (Morato and Pitcher, 2002).”
- Predicting ecological consequences of marine top predator declines. (2008, background): “Although these models have proven very useful for the development of hypotheses [ 61 ], their assumptions that all energy is cycled”
- Structural Degradation in Mediterranean Sea Food Webs: Testing Ecological Hypotheses Using Stochastic and Mass-Balance Modelling (2008, methodology): “For this purpose, we used two different modelling approaches: a stochastic structural food-web model, the Niche model, which is an extension of the Cascade model and uses species richness (S) and connectance (C = Links/Species(2)) as input parameters to construct a web (Williams and Martinez 2000), ”
- Interannual variability in the Northern California Current food web structure: Changes in energy flow pathways and the role of forage fish, euphausiids, and jellyfish (2012, methodology): “Each trophic network model was initially assembled using ECOPATH algorithms (Walters et al., 1997, Christensen and Walters, 2004) as revisions of the generalized seasonal models described in Ruzicka et al. (2007).”
- Changes in the structure and function of the North Sea fish foodweb, 1973–2000, and the impacts of fishing and climate (2005, methodology): “, 2000; Christensen and Walters, 2004), though no implementation has yet been published for the North Sea. Greenstreet et al. (1997) proposed a different approach that was not based on considerations of mass balance. The basic idea was to calculate the food requirements of the fish assemblage from a”
- Best practice in Ecopath with Ecosim food-web models for ecosystem-based management (2016, methodology): “…to annotate Ecopath input data with approprite references and to describe the origin of the data used to create he model in the model pedigree (Christensen and Walters, 2004; orissette, 2007), which describes the precision of the data and ets confidence intervals to be used with this data if…”
- Projecting changes in the distribution and productivity of living marine resources: A critical review of the suite of modelling approaches used in the large European project VECTORS (2016, methodology): “For spatial investigations, Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE) (Christensen and Walters, 2004) has become a the most often employed modelling”
- Effects of climate‐driven primary production change on marine food webs: implications for fisheries and conservation (2010, methodology): “The EwE approach is described in detail in Christensen & Walters (2004a), so only a brief description follows.”
- A method for identifying keystone species in food web models (2006, methodology): “…approach proposed by Polovina (1984) and subsequently upgraded with a variety of ecologi- e c o l o g i c a l m o d e l l i n g 1 9 5 ( 2 0 0 6 ) 153–171 155 cal and theoretical approaches (Christensen and Pauly, 1992; Walters et al., 1997, 2000; Pauly et al., 2000; Christensen and Walters, 2004).”
- Lower trophic levels and detrital biomass control the Bay of Biscay continental shelf food web: Implications for ecosystem management (2011, background): “The paper of Christensen (1995) included several ecosystems for which the maturity state could be compared before and after a disturbance, notably fishing, and the findings were in all cases in agreement with disturbances leading to a reduction in maturity (Christensen and Walters, 2004).”
- Assessing the trophic position and ecological role of squids in marine ecosystems by means of food-web models (2013, methodology): “At present, the Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE) approach and software (Christensen and Walters, 2004) is the most widely applied approach for building ecological models of marine ecosystems.”