Daytime Naps, Motor Memory Consolidation and Regionally Specific Sleep Spindles

By Masaki Nishida, Matthew P. Walker. 2007

532 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Background Increasing evidence demonstrates that motor-skill memories improve across a night of sleep, and that non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep commonly plays a role in orchestrating these consolidation enhancements. Here we show the benefit of a daytime nap on motor memory consolidation and its relationship not simply with global sleep-stage measures, but unique characteristics of sleep spindles at regionally specific locations; mapping to the corresponding memory representation. Methodology/Principal Findings Two groups of subjects trained on a motor-skill task using their left hand – a paradigm known to result in overnight plastic changes in the contralateral, right motor cortex. Both groups trained in the morning and were tested 8 hr later, with one group obtaining a 60–90 minute intervening midday nap, while the other group remained awake. At testing, subjects that did not nap showed no significant performance improvement, yet those that did nap expressed a highly significant consolidation enhancement. Within the nap group, the amount of offline improvement showed a significant correlation with the global measure of stage-2 NREM sleep. However, topographical sleep spindle analysis revealed more precise correlations. Specifically, when spindle activity at the central electrode of the non-learning hemisphere (left) was subtracted from that in the learning hemisphere (right), representing the homeostatic difference following learning, strong positive relationships with offline memory improvement emerged–correlations that were not evident for either hemisphere alone. Conclusions/Significance These results demonstrate that motor memories are dynamically facilitated across daytime naps, enhancements that are uniquely associated with electrophysiological events expressed at local, anatomically discrete locations of the brain.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Matthew P. Walker
  2. Jan Born
  3. Susanne Diekelmann
  4. Robert Stickgold
  5. Lisa Marshall
  6. Edwin M Robertson
  7. Geneviève Albouy
  8. Jessica D. Payne

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. Matthew P. Walker
  2. Jan Born
  3. Robert Stickgold
  4. Susanne Diekelmann
  5. Lisa Marshall
  6. Julien Doyon
  7. Geneviève Albouy
  8. Edwin M Robertson

Citations in the corpus