Genotype × environment interaction of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in South Africa: II. Stability analysis of yield performance

By J. Purchase, H. Hatting, C. V. van Deventer. 2000

638 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/907c8362a85d7c1e05a559267a27cc41d8a37a9f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Agronomy and Crop Science

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

The use of parametric and non-parametric measures for selecting stable and adapted barley lines (2018, methodology): “The next stability parameter derived from the AMMI analysis is the AMMI’s stability values (ASV) as proposed by Purchase et al. (2000) .”
Comparison of parametric and non-parametric methods for selecting stable and adapted durum wheat genotypes in variable environments (2008, methodology): “The measures of Si (1), Si (2), NPi (1), W2i , S 2 di, ASV, RS, and Ii are related to the concept of static stability and do not relate to genotypic mean yield and are referred to as group II.”
Genotype by environment interaction components underlying variations in root, sugar and white sugar yield in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) (2018, methodology): “AMMI stability value (ASV) was calculated followed by a formula developed by Purchase et al. (2000): ASV…”
Use of AMMI and other stability statistics in the simultaneous selection of rice genotypes for yield and stability under direct-seeded conditions (2014, methodology): “This ASV is comparable with the methods used by Shukla, Eberhart, and Russell for genotype stability (Purchase et al., 2000).”
AMMI stability value and simultaneous estimation of yield and yield stability in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) (2011, methodology): “The AMMI model does not make provision for a quantitative stability measure, such a measure is essential in order to quantify and rank genotypes according to their yield stability, the ASV measure was proposed by Purchase et al. (2000) to cope with this problem.”
GGE biplot and AMMI analysis of barley yield performance in Iran (2017, methodology): “…the AMMI’s stability measures (EV1 and EVF), sums of the absolute value of the IPCA scores (SIPC1 and SIPCF), AMMI statistic coefficient (Di and DF), and AMMI’s stability value (ASV) were calculated using the formulas proposed by Zobel (1994), Zhang et al. (1998) and Purchase et al. (2000).”
AMMI analysis of the adaptability and yield stability of yellow passion fruit varieties (2014, methodology): “For this reason, Purchase et al. (2000) proposed an ASV measure to quantify and classify genotypes according to their yield stability in that ASV is the distance of the varieties from point zero of the scatter diagram (IPCA1 vs. IPCA2).”
Genotype × environment interaction by AMMI and GGE biplot analysis in three consecutive generations of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under normal and drought stress conditions. (2013, methodology): “Purchase et al. (2000) developed a quantitative stability value to rank genotypes through the AMMI model, named the AMMI Stability Value (ASV).”
PARAMETRIC AND NON-PARAMETRIC MEASURES FOR EVALUATING YIELD STABILITY AND ADAPTABILITY IN BARLEY DOUBLED HAPLOID LINES (2016, methodology): “…and Thennarasu (NPi) were calculated using the formulas suggested by Eberhart and Russell (1966), Wricke (1962), Shukla (1972), Francis and Kannenberg (1978), Purchase et al. (2000), Nassar and Huehn (1987), Huehn (1990), Kang (1988), Fox et al. (1990), and Thennarasu (1995), respectively.”