OpenState: programming platform-independent stateful openflow applications inside the switch
By Giuseppe Bianchi, M. Bonola, A. Capone, C. Cascone. CCRV, 2014
363 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/907830c20463491a78da2bbee95f4f654813448e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- NFV and SDN—Key Technology Enablers for 5G Networks (2017, neutral): “OpenState [26] is adding this possibility.”
- A Survey of Machine Learning Techniques Applied to Software Defined Networking (SDN): Research Issues and Challenges (2019, methodology): “There exist other less popular proposals such as OVSDB [32], ForCES [33], Protocol-Oblivious Forwarding (POF) [34], NETCONF [35], LISP [36], OpFlex [37] and OpenState [38].”
- Distributed SDN Control: Survey, Taxonomy, and Challenges (2018, methodology): “In particular, the OpenState proposal [29] is a stateful platform-independent data plane extension of the current OpenFlow match/action abstraction supporting a finite-state machine (FSM) programming model called Mealy Machine in addition to the flow programming model adopted by OpenFlow.”
- SDN-WISE: Design, prototyping and experimentation of a stateful SDN solution for WIreless SEnsor networks (2015, background): “Furthermore, as proposed in [6] for the wired domain, SDN-WISE defines simple mechanisms for the definition and handling of the Flow Table that make SDN-WISE stateful as compared to traditional OpenFlow which is stateless.”