Explainable Planning

By Maria Fox, Derek Long, Daniele Magazzeni. 2017

305 citations recorded by the source corpus.

As AI is increasingly being adopted into application solutions, the challenge of supporting interaction with humans is becoming more apparent. Partly this is to support integrated working styles, in which humans and intelligent systems cooperate in problem-solving, but also it is a necessary step in the process of building trust as humans migrate greater responsibility to such systems. The challenge is to find effective ways to communicate the foundations of AI-driven behaviour, when the algorithms that drive it are far from transparent to humans. In this paper we consider the opportunities that arise in AI planning, exploiting the modelbased representations that form a familiar and common basis for communication with users, while acknowledging the gap between planning algorithms and human problem-solving.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, AI Ethics, Fairness & Society

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Subbarao Kambhampati
  2. Sarath Sreedharan
  3. Tathagata Chakraborti
  4. Longo Luca
  5. Giulia Vilone
  6. Tim Miller
  7. Ben Z. Yuan
  8. David Bau

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

  1. Ben Z. Yuan
  2. David Bau
  3. Michael A. Specter
  4. Tim Miller
  5. Leilani H. Gilpin
  6. Giulia Vilone
  7. Yiannis Demiris
  8. Lalana Kagal

In AI Ethics, Fairness & Society

  1. Longo Luca
  2. Giulia Vilone
  3. Tim Miller
  4. Leilani H. Gilpin
  5. Lalana Kagal

Citations in the corpus