Differences in juvenile phenotypes and survival between hatchery stocks and a natural population provide evidence for modified selection due to captive breeding

By K. Kostow. 2004

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/903dedf7fc96102d1c7384e6782a86b82b72dbb7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

In Genetics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

An integrated comparison of captive-bred and wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): Implications for supportive breeding programs (2008, background): “In the absence of genetic data, many authors have hypothesized that because of a common brood-stock (hence a common genetic background) phenotypic plasticity predominantly determines phenotypic differences between captive-bred and wild animals (Kostow, 2004; Dahl et al., 2006).”
Maturation in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar, Salmonidae): a synthesis of ecological, genetic, and molecular processes (2020, background): “However, this strategy has the potential to backfire if the environmental conditions selecting against large, late maturing, individuals are not well understood (Kostow 2004).”
The importance of identifying spatial population structure in restocking and stock enhancement programmes (2006, background): “Environentally induced phenotypic changes in the hatchery could lso influence immediate fitness (Kostow, 2004).”
Responsible genetic approach to stock restoration, sea ranching and stock enhancement of marine fishes and invertebrates (2017, background): “The fitness effects of hatcherywild hybridizations have been studied in salmonids because homing behavior is conducive to experiments that assess traits influencing survival and reproductive success (Kostow 2004; Araki et al. 2007, 2008).”
Factors that contribute to the ecological risks of salmon and steelhead hatchery programs and some mitigating strategies (2009, background): “Poor life-time survivals and low reproductive success by hatchery fish has also been documented by numerous other studies (Reisenbichler and McIntyre 1977; Reisenbichler and Rubin 1999; McGinnity et al. 2003; Kostow 2004; McLean et al. 2004; Ford et al. 2006; Araki et al. 2006, 2007).”
Framework for Assessing Viability of Threatened and Endangered Chinook Salmon and Steelhead in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Basin (2007, background): “These predictions are supported by mounting empirical evidence (e.g., Reisenbichler and McIntyre 1977; Chilcote et al. 1986; Reisenbichler and Rubin 1999; McLean et al. 2003; Kostow 2004).”