The national impact of European Union regulatory policy: Three Europeanization mechanisms

By Christoph Knill, D. Lehmkuhl. 2002

478 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Regulation, the Regulatory State and European Politics (2008, background): “The role of EU-developments has been said to constitute largely an additional source of legitimisation for national processes ( Knill and Lehmkuhl 2003 ).”
The domestic implications of European soft law: framing and transmitting change in employment policy (2006, background): “First, we must refer to the idea of framing by the EU (Knill and Lehmkuhl 2002).”
Analysing the differential impact of the Bologna Process: Theoretical considerations on national conditions for international policy convergence (2008, background): “By now Bologna has become a quite complex process that can be basically described as transnational higher education regime (Nagel 2006, p. 79; Walter 2006, p. 194) framing domestic beliefs and expectations (Knill and Lehmkuhl 2002; Veiga 2005, p. 10).”
EU rules beyond EU borders: theorizing external governance in European politics (2009, result): “…the development of the external governance approach which may focus less on what the EU does in promoting its norms than, much akin to the research on ‘Europeanization’ (e.g. Knill and Lehmkuhl 2002; Radaelli 2004), on the domestic conditions for effective policy implementation in third countries.”