Qualitative Comparative Analysis in Critical Perspective

131 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Critical Tension: Sufficiency and Parsimony in QCA (2019, methodology): “B&T attempt a formal response to a series of critiques over the correctness of the QCA solutions (among others, Hug 2013; Lucas and Szatrowski 2014; Munck 2016; Seawright 2014; Tanner 2014), using a systematic method involving an a priori known causal structure and test whether the different QCA…”
Fuzzy Sets on Shaky Ground: Parameter Sensitivity and Confirmation Bias in fsQCA (2015, methodology): “Lucas and Szatrowski (2014) suggest that the introduction of variables known to be unrelated to the outcome routinely yields false positives. Yet again, however, they focus only on csQCA. By contrast, Skaaning (2011) takes direct aim at the calibration and reduction parameters that are specific to f”
Designing Research With Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Approaches, Challenges, and Tools (2020, methodology): “Concurrently, issues surrounding the use of QCA have been highlighted, targeting either QCA as a method (e.g., Hug 2013; Krogslund, Choi, and Poertner 2015; Lucas and Szatrowski 2014; Paine 2015; Seawright 2014; Tanner 2014) or current practices (e.”