Cougar predation and population growth of sympatric mule deer and white-tailed deer

By H. Robinson, R. Wielgus, J. Gwilliam. 2002

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Endangered, apparently: the role of apparent competition in endangered species conservation (2009, background): “…and predation niche overlap (Caut et al., 2006; Cooley et al., 2008; Pope et al., 2008), prey fitness or predation rates (Roemer et al., 2001; Robinson et al., 2002; Wittmer et al., 2007), and predator functional and numeric responses (Norbury, 2001), as well as correlative analyses of…”
A review of the population dynamics of mule deer and black‐tailed deer Odocoileus hemionus in North America (2013, background): “Predation also plays a larger role in declines of mule deer in multi-prey, multi-predator systems that have experienced large and recent changes in predator or alternative prey populations (Hatter & Janz 1994, Robinson et al. 2002, Cooley et al. 2008).”
Evaluating Global Positioning System Telemetry Techniques for Estimating Cougar Predation Parameters (2009, background): “Estimates of the rate at which prey are killed (Sand et al. 2008), the selection of prey species in multi-prey systems (Robinson et al. 2002, Knopff and Boyce 2007), the age–sex structure of prey (Mills and Shenk 1992), the physical condition of prey (Husseman et al. 2003), and the spatial…”