Disability studies as a source of critical inquiry for the field of assistive technology
By Jennifer Mankoff, Gillian R. Hayes, Devva Kasnitz. 2010
378 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Human Factors and Ergonomics, Occupational Therapy, AI Ethics, Fairness & Society, Social Sciences & Humanities
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In AI Ethics, Fairness & Society
In Social Sciences & Humanities
Citations in the corpus
- Patching Gender: Non-binary Utopias in HCI (2019, background): “…cis and binary trans people, and interlock with the concerns of disabled people and/or people of colour, since bodily standards and expectations that are premised on conventional white, western aesthetic standards have long been linked to racist [15], ableist [14] and body-shaming [20] outcomes.”
- An Age-Old Problem: Examining the Discourses of Ageing in HCI and Strategies for Future Research (2015, background): “…attended to here potentially affect all manner of human-centred topics within HCI such as exploring further the social construction of disability [Mankoff et al. 2010], or the construction of knowledge and power dy namics in domains such as ICT4D [Dourish and Mainwaring 2012] and…”