THE ENGLAND AND WALES NON-FOSSIL FUEL OBLIGATION: History and Lessons

By C. Mitchell. 2000

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8ff04ad4e9b2c9194447ad41092161426bbccefa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Energy

Citations in the corpus

Wind power, discourse coalitions and climate change: breaking the stalemate? (2004, background): “3 For discussions on the NFFO, see Mitchell, 1995, 2000; Helm, 2002.”
Comparison of feed-in tariff, quota and auction mechanisms to support wind power development (2008, methodology): “Following Mitchell and Connor (2004), we break down the value of the ROC into its components, and predict how each of these components will change in future periods.”
Which renewable energy policy is a venture capitalist's best friend? Empirical evidence from a survey of international cleantech investors (2009, background): “Even though the design of the scheme was not the only factor contributing to the scheme's failure (Mitchell, 2000), a comparison of effectiveness seemed to result in a lead for price-based systems as they had been introduced in Denmark, Germany and Spain (W ¨ ustenhagen, 2000, p. 278).”
REFIT and RPS: options for a harmonised Community framework (2004, background): “…planning system, i.e. in obtaining site approvals for wind farms—resulted in one of the lowest levels of RES-E in the EU and failed to create a domestic RES-E equipment industry (Mitchell, 2000; Dinica, 2003)—all this in one of the best-endowed countries with regard to wind resource availability.”
Transforming technological regimes for sustainable development: A role for alternative technology niches? (2003, background): “Today, the wind energy niche includes large investors and operators (Mitchell, 2000).”
Towards a green energy economy? The EU Energy Union's transition to a low-carbon zero subsidy electricity system – Lessons from the UK's Electricity Market Reform (2016, methodology): “Support for renewables was provided through NFFO auctions for effectively Feed-in Tariffs (FiTs) (Mitchell, 2000).”
Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany (2006, methodology): “The 1990’s were dominated by two types of mechanisms: On one hand, competition or quota based – for example, the Non-Fossil Fuel Obligation (NFFO) in the UK (Mitchell 2000), alternatively, variations on pre-determined premium payments or tariffs, as in Germany.”
Prices versus quantities: choosing policies for promoting the development of renewable energy (2003, background): “Insufficient incentives to lower costs is considered to be the principal weakness of feed-in tariffs, while competitive bidding systems have proved to be particularly effective in this respect (Mitchell, 1995, 2000).”
Wind Power in Europe: A Simultaneous Innovation–Diffusion Model (2007, background): “Moreover, the impact on innovation activities and thus on cost reductions may also differ depending on the support scheme chosen (e.g., Mitchell 2000; Menanteau et al. 2003).”
Regional distribution of photovoltaic deployment in the UK and its determinants: A spatial econometric approach (2015, unknown): “Müller and Rode (2013) analyse spatial spillover at the micro scale, focusing on Wiesbaden, Germany, by employing a geocoded data set of the grid-connected PV systems set up through 2009.”
Emerging in between: The multi-level governance of renewable energy in the English regions (2007, background): “A number of studies in the late 1990s identified local and regional planning difficulties delaying renewable energy projects, particularly wind farms, which are the most commercially viable and largest contributor to renewable energy goals (Mitchell, 2000; Hartnell, 2001).”