Reconciling EFT and hybrid calculations of the light MSSM Higgs-boson mass

By Henning Bahl, Sven Heinemeyer, Wolfgang Hollik, Georg Weiglein. 2017

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Various methods are used in the literature for predicting the lightest CP-even Higgs boson mass in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM). Fixed-order diagrammatic calculations capture all effects at a given order and yield accurate results for scales of supersymmetric (SUSY) particles that are not separated too much from the weak scale. Effective field theory calculations allow a resummation of large logarithmic contributions up to all orders and therefore yield accurate results for a high SUSY scale. A hybrid approach, where both methods have been combined, is implemented in the computer code FeynHiggs. So far, however, at large scales sizeable differences have been observed between FeynHiggs and other pure EFT codes. In this work, the various approaches are analytically compared with each other in a simple scenario in which all SUSY mass scales are chosen to be equal to each other. Three main sources are identified that account for the major part of the observed differences. Firstly, it is shown that the scheme conversion of the input parameters that is commonly used for the comparison of fixed-order results is not adequate for the comparison of results containing a series of higher-order logarithms. Secondly, the treatment of higher-order terms arising from the determination of the Higgs propagator pole is addressed. Thirdly, the effect of different parametrizations in particular of the top Yukawa coupling in the non-logarithmic terms is investigated. Taking into account all of these effects, in the considered simple scenario very good agreement is found for scales above 1 TeV between the results obtained using the EFT approach and the hybrid approach of FeynHiggs.

Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8fe9ce3add01799846da9bd6414ee6f07f25e216

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. Cms Collaboration
  2. Atlas Collaboration
  3. Gudrun Heinrich
  4. Fabio Maltoni
  5. Valentin Hirschi
  6. R. Frederix
  7. M. Zaro
  8. Ansgar Denner

Citations in the corpus