Technological unemployment in industrial countries

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Embodied and disembodied technological change: The sectoral patterns of job-creation and job-destruction (2019, background): “Comprehensive analyses are in Freeman, Clark, and Soete (1982); Freeman and Soete (1987) and Vivarelli (1995) (see also Feldmann, 2013; Vivarelli 2013 and 2014).”
Automation fears: Drivers and solutions (2020, background): “Furthermore, the use of ATs raises concerns regarding what individuals, companies, and social institutions should do if the automation fears are materialised into severe technological unemployment (Feldmann, 2013; Postel‐Vinay, 2002; Walsh, 2018).”
Technology and employment: Mass unemployment or job creation? Empirical evidence from European patenting firms (2018, background): “On the one hand, depending on the different institutional and economic contexts, compensation can be more or less effective and technological unemployment only partially reabsorbed (Amendola et al., 2001; Feldmann, 2013).”
Technological change and employment: is Europe ready for the challenge? (2018, unknown): “At last, Feldmann (2013)—using data on 21 industrial countries over the period 1985–2009—assesses the impact of innovation (proxied by triadic patents normalized by population) on aggregate unemployment, controlling for a set of macroeconomic factors such as labor market features, tax wedge,…”