Changes in potential habitat of 147 North American breeding bird species in response to redistribution of trees and climate following predicted climate change

By Stephen N. Matthews, Louis Iverson, Anantha M. Prasad, Matthew P. Peters. 2011

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8fc7b35a9bf1a36229590eba1e3ee2110bac44f6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. J. Thorson
2. J. Velásquez-Tibatá
3. Stephanie S. Romañach
4. Malin Pinsky
5. Eric J. Ward
6. David N. Bucklin
7. J. Schuetz
8. M. Basille

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. J. Velásquez-Tibatá
2. Malin Pinsky
3. J. Schuetz
4. G. Langham
5. J. Belmaker
6. James I. Watling
7. T. Distler

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. J. Thorson
2. Eric J. Ward
3. J. Velásquez-Tibatá
4. Stephanie S. Romañach
5. Malin Pinsky
6. David N. Bucklin
7. J. Schuetz
8. M. Basille

Citations in the corpus

• Model‐based inference for estimating shifts in species distribution, area occupied and centre of gravity (2016, methodology): “Amodel-based approach to estimating shifts in distribution has been used in previous ecological studies (Elith, Kearney & Phillips 2010; Matthews et al. 2011), although these have generally used habitat envelope modelling (i.e. predicting density as a function of measured habitat variables) rather…”
• Empirical Evidence for the Scale Dependence of Biotic Interactions (2015, methodology): “We chose a suite of environmental variables to use as predictors that are relevant to the distributions of breeding birds in North America (Meehan et al., 2010; Rittenhouse et al., 2010; Matthews et al., 2011; Barbet-Massin & Jetz, 2014).”
• Comparing species distribution models constructed with different subsets of environmental predictors (2015, methodology): “Likewise, the eight-class land cover classification used here may have been inadequate for species associated with rare or specific habitats/vegetation types, in which cases vegetation inventory datasets may be useful (e.g. Matthews et al., 2011).”
• Stacked species distribution models and macroecological models provide congruent projections of avian species richness under climate change (2015, background): “…in the United States and Canada have tended to focus on a single season and have either used a subset of available species (Peterson, 2003; Hitch & Leberg, 2007; Stralberg et al., 2009; Matthews et al., 2011) or coarse occurrence data based on range maps (Jetz et al., 2007; Lawler et al., 2009).”