A dynamic interplay within the frontoparietal network underlies rhythmic spatial attention

By Ian C. Fiebelkorn, M. Pinsk, Sabine Kastner. 2018

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Rhythms of human attention and memory: An embedded process perspective (2022, background): “Linking frontal control processes to eye-movements, in macaques, the theta rhythm in the FEF has been shown to modulate the gamma activity in the lateral intraparietal area (LIP), as part of the attentional network, which enhanced perceptual sensitivity (Fiebelkorn et al., 2018).”
Hierarchical consciousness: the Nested Observer Windows model (2024, background): “…abstraction from smaller-faster observer windows through emergence, a goal-directed observer window in frontal cortex initiates an action plan that is propagated down to its subsystems through submergence (Voytek et al. 2015a, Helfrich et al. 2017, Fiebelkorn et al. 2018, Riddle et al. 2021).”
Top-down and bottom-up interactions rely on nested brain oscillations to shape rhythmic visual attention sampling (2025, unknown): “Interestingly, it has recently been proposed that attentional sampling is organized via two alternating attentional states [61,62].”
Tracking neural correlates of prioritizing working memory representations through retrospective attentional strengthening (2022, background): “13 A previous study found a PAC between frontal theta and parietal alpha in local field potentials when non14 human primates performed spatial attention tasks (58).”
Shared resources between visual attention and visual working memory are allocated through rhythmic sampling (2019, result): “This result is in line with previous evidence showing that attention does not operate in a static fashion, but instead has an intrinsically oscillatory nature (Busch & vanRullen, 2010; Fiebelkorn et al. 2011; Landau & Fries, 2012; Fiebelkorn et al. 2013; Fiebelkorn et al. 2018).”
Functional Specialization in the Attention Network (2019, background): “…et al. 2001, Womelsdorf et al. 2006), while increased beta-band activity has been associated with the suppression of motor processing (Pogosyan et al. 2009, Zhang et al. 2008), including the suppression of attentional shifts and/or eye movements (Fiebelkorn et al. 2018, Gregoriou et al. 2012).”