Sexual Infidelity among Married and Cohabiting Americans

By Judith K. Treas, D. Giesen. 2000

552 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, General Health Professions, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8f8e0f0c5afac3e62fad991875189ec3861aa5d5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. David C. Atkins
2. Paul R. Amato
3. Elizabeth S. Allen
4. Denise Previti
5. D. Carr
6. K. Springer
7. S. Glass
8. Amy M. Burdette

In General Health Professions

1. D. Carr
2. K. Springer
3. Amy M. Burdette
4. C. Ellison
5. S. Kiene
6. Paul R. Amato
7. W. Barta

In Social Psychology

1. David C. Atkins
2. Elizabeth S. Allen
3. Paul R. Amato
4. D. Carr
5. K. Springer
6. Denise Previti
7. S. Glass
8. Anders Sandberg

Citations in the corpus

• Motivations for infidelity in heterosexual dating couples: The roles of gender, personality differences, and sociosexual orientation (2005, background): “People who have greater opportunity to be unfaithful are more likely to be unfaithful (e.g. Treas & Giesen, 2000).”
• Is Infidelity a Cause or a Consequence of Poor Marital Quality? (2004, background): “The finding that EMS is more common among husbands than wives appears frequently in the research literature (Treas & Giesen, 2000; Waite & Joyner, 2001).”
• Neuroenhancement of Love and Marriage: The Chemicals Between Us (2008, background): “The likelihood of having had extramarital sex increases with having been divorced, with the length of a relationship and in less happy relationships [3, 70, 81].”
• Advances in Families and Health Research in the 21st Century (2010, background): “These characteristics included being physically or sexually abused as a child (Cherlin et al., 2004), greater sexual infidelity (Treas & Giesen, 2000), less education, lower earnings potential (Xie, Raymo, Goyette, & Thornton, 2003), and poorer health behaviors (Koskinen et al., 2007).”
• Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Contextual Factors in Engaging in and Responding to Extramarital Involvement (2006, background): “Controlling for other variables (e.g., permissive attitudes towards EMI) may affect the relation between religious attendance and EMI (Treas & Giesen, 2000).”
• Are There Religious Variations in Marital Infidelity? (2007, background): “Previous research establishes a number of individual-level sociodemographic characteristics as correlates or predictors of marital infidelity (Choi, Catania, & Dolcini, 1994; Leigh, Temple, & Trocki, 1993; Smith, 1994; Treas & Giesen, 2000 ).”