A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness.

By M. Davidson, J. Keating. Physical Therapy, 2002

780 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8f73ce99916a43afa44019bb26601b23371f4900

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Pathology and Forensic Medicine

1. N. Roach
2. P. J. Watson
3. S. Woby
4. M. Urmston

In Pharmacology

1. N. Roach
2. P. J. Watson
3. S. Woby
4. M. Urmston
5. J. Hertel
6. R. Corbett

In Psychiatry and Mental health

1. N. Roach
2. P. J. Watson
3. S. Woby
4. M. Urmston
5. J. Hertel
6. R. Corbett

Citations in the corpus

• Psychometric properties of the TSK‐11: A shortened version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (2005, methodology): “Global Rating Scales have been used extensively in back pain related research when assessing the responsiveness of self-report measures (Davidson and Keating, 2002; de Vet et al., 2001; Garratt et al., 2001; Stratford and Binkley, 2000; Stratford et al., 1998; Taylor et al., 1999) and are capable…”