Agenda and emergence: Contingent and planned activities in a meeting
By Arnulf Deppermann, R. Schmitt, Lorenza Mondada. 2010
127 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The transition between phases of activities is a practical problem which participants in an interaction have to deal with routinely. In meetings, the sequence of phases of activity is often outlined by a written agenda. However, transitions still have to be accomplished by local interactional work of the participants. In a detailed conversation analytic case study based on video-data, it is shown how participants collaboratively accomplish an emergent interactional state of affairs (a break-like activity) which differs widely from the state of affairs which was projected by a written agenda (the next presentation), although in doing so, the participants still show their continuous orientation to the agenda. The paper argues that the reconstruction of emergent developments in interaction calls for a multimodal analysis of interaction, because the fine-grained multimodal co-ordination of bodily and verbal resources provides for opportunities of sequentially motivated, relevant next actions. These, however, can amount to emergent activity sequences, which may be at odds with the activity types which are projected by an interactional agenda or expected on behalf of some institutional routine.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8f72a39595f8c38cd8c2372b70d6bbc5366571ab
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Language and Linguistics
In Literature and Literary Theory
Citations in the corpus
- Walking away: The embodied achievement of activity closings in mobile interaction (2013, methodology): “Ford et al., 1996), as well as embodied ones, such as gesture, gaze, head movements, nods, facial expressions and body postures (e.g. Goodwin, 1981; Heath, 1986). In the methodic organization of turn-taking and sequences, the multimodal resources involved do not only concern grammar and gesture, but”