A method for group decision-making based on determining weights of decision makers using TOPSIS

344 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Exergetic, economic and environmental (3E) analyses, and multi-objective optimization of a CO2/NH3 cascade refrigeration system (2014, background): “In fact, the fundamental principle of this approach is that the chosen final optimal point must be in the shortest possible distance from the ideal point and the furthest distance from the non-ideal one [29].”
Thermal–economic–environmental analysis and multi-objective optimization of an ice thermal energy storage system for gas turbine cycle inlet air cooling (2014, background): “In TOPSIS decision-making method, deviation of each solution from the ideal and non-ideal points is evaluated and the solution with minimum distance from the ideal point and maximum distance from the non-ideal solution is selected as the final optimal point [57].”
A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications (2012, methodology): “Yue (2011) developed a method to determine decision makers' weights under a group decision environment described in an air quality assessment in Guangzhou during 16th Asian Olympic.”