Financial crisis in Southeast Asia: dispelling illusion the Minskyan way

245 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Financialization in Developing and Emerging Countries (2013, methodology): “(Arestis and Glickman 2002: 255) Capital account liberalization is therefore criticized as a policy move that favors the rise of a boom-bust cycle in emerging countries.”
A post Keynesian framework of exchange rate determination: a Minskyan approach (2015, background): “The debtor position was either public, as most acutely experienced in the debt crisis of the 1980s, or private as in the (Asian) financial crises of the late 1990s (Arestis and Glickman, 2002; Herr, 1992; Herr and Hübner, 2005; Kregel, 2004, 2009; Palma, 1998).”
A developing country view of the current global crisis: what should not be forgotten and what should be done (2009, background): “Analyses of other crises in developing countries within this framework include Ros (2002) and Cruz et al. (2006) for the Mexican crisis of 1995; Arestis and Glickman (2002) for the Asian crises of 1997–98; Taylor (1998B) and Palma (1998) for the previously mentioned cases and the Russian and Brazi”
Financialisation in emerging economies: a systematic overview and comparison with Anglo-Saxon economies (2017, background): “…financial systems, other East Asian economies – such as Indonesia (0.62), Thailand (0.64), Malaysia (0.71) and South Korea (0.71) – started deregulation efforts during the 1980s8 which crucially contributed to the outbreak of the East Asian crisis in 1997/1998 (Arestis and Glickman 2002).”