Long‐term assessment of a multidisciplinary approach to thyroid nodule diagnostic evaluation

By L. Yassa, E. Cibas, C. Benson, M. Frates, P. Doubilet, A. Gawande, Francis D. Moore, Brian W Kim, V. Nosé, E. Marqusee and 2 more. Cancer, 2007

732 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Epidemiology, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8f52d9b563e225ada4a465699f5b85b273074c18

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. M. Merino
2. S. Asa
3. V. Livolsi
4. Zubair Baloch
5. W. Frable
6. R. Demay
7. P. Vielh
8. M. Sidawy

Citations in the corpus

• The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (2009, unknown): “Synonymous terms (eg, AUS and FLUS) should not be used to denote two distinct interpretations.”
• Diagnostic terminology and morphologic criteria for cytologic diagnosis of thyroid lesions: A synopsis of the National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine‐Needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference (2008, background): “The most favored one is a six-category diagnostic scheme consisting of benign, lesion (atypia) of undetermined significance, follicular neoplasm, suspicious, malignant, and unsatisfactory.(29,30,33,34) With regard to the reporting of ‘‘risk of malignancy’’ for each diagnostic category this is genera”