Nontarget Effects of Biological Control

By P. Follett, J. Duan. Springer US, 2000

286 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Genetic control of invasive fish: technological options and its role in integrated pest management (2014, background): “For the vast majority of invasive fish (and other taxa), even those causing major ecological or economic damage, logistical considerations and costs prevent large-scale control (Whitten and Foster 1975; Simberloff and Stilling 1996; Follett and Duan 1999).”
Biological control of invasive alien plants in South Africa: necessity, circumspection, and success (2005, background): “A burgeoning literature questions the wisdom of using any form of biological control (Howarth 1991; Simberloff and Stiling 1996; Thomas and Willis 1998; Lockwood 1999; Follett and Duan 1999; Wajnberg et aL 2001).”
Intraguild responses of aphid predators on apple to the invasion of an exotic species, Harmonia axyridis (2003, unknown): “Howarth (1991) and Follett and Duan (1999) reviewed the non-target effects of biological control actions enumerating how negative impacts can come about and providing suggestions for maintaining better control of future biological control activity.”
Exotic biological control agents: A solution or contribution to arthropod invasions? (2016, background): “Many entomologists debated the beneficial versus detrimental aspects of classical biological control in the late 1990s and early 2000s (see Follett and Duan 2000; Samways 1997; Lockwood et al. 2001; Wajnberg et al. 2001; Louda et al. 2003; Pearson and Callaway 2003; Messing and Wright 2006).”