Environmental regulation and the productivity of Japanese manufacturing industries

By Mitsutsugu Hamamoto. 2006

545 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8f3ceb5139087f07b5142c3388a7c74d85824381

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Induced innovation in clean energy technologies from foreign environmental policy stringency? (2019, background): “The literature is clear on the specification of integrating well thought-out lag structures into environmental innovation models (Brunnermeier & Cohen, 2003, Hamamoto, 2006; Johnstone et al., 2010; Popp et al., 2011; Weyant, 1999).”
Environmental Regulation and Competitiveness: Empirical Evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European Manufacturing Sectors (2015, methodology): “…effect of environmental regulation obtained for the sample of the European countries contrast with the results of Jaffe and Palmer (1997) for the U.S. and Hamamoto (2006) for Japan, where more PACE was found to bring about significant R&D enhancement effects both in the short- and the medium-term.”
Going green or going away: Environmental regulation, economic geography and firms’ strategies in China’s pollution-intensive industries (2014, methodology): “…of attention is directed towards analyzing the relationship between environmental regulation and firm restructuring based either on PHH (Dean et al., 2009; Spatareanu, 2007; Tole and Koop, 2010) or on PH (Costantini and Crespi, 2008; Hamamoto, 2006; Kumar and Managi, 2009; Murty and Kumar, 2003).”
Environmental regulations, induced R&D, and productivity: Evidence from Taiwan's manufacturing industries (2012, unknown): “More specifically, the productivity measure used by Hamamoto (2006) does not control for the endogenous choice of changing input combinations in response to stringent environmental regulations, leading to a biased estimate of the productivity effect of induced R&D.”
Environmental regulations and industrial competitiveness: evidence from China (2018, methodology): “Hamamoto (2006) applied an econometric model to Japanese manufacturing industries and found evidence to support Porter’s Hypothesis.”
Why does emissions trading under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) not affect firms’ competitiveness? Empirical findings from the literature (2018, background): “There is a large amount of literature on the innovation effects of environmental policies in general (Acemoglu, Aghion, Bursztyn, & Hemous, 2012; Ambec et al., 2013; Brunnermeier & Cohen, 2003; Gagelmann & Frondel, 2005; Hamamoto, 2006; Jaffe & Palmer, 1997; for a review see Popp, 2010).”