CATH: increased structural coverage of functional space

By Ian Sillitoe, Nicola Bordin, N. Dawson, Vaishali P. Waman, P. Ashford, Harry M. Scholes, Camilla S. M. Pang, Laurel Woodridge, Clemens Rauer, Neeladri Sen and 8 more. Nucleic Acids Res., 2020

432 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract CATH (https://www.cathdb.info) identifies domains in protein structures from wwPDB and classifies these into evolutionary superfamilies, thereby providing structural and functional annotations. There are two levels: CATH-B, a daily snapshot of the latest domain structures and superfamily assignments, and CATH+, with additional derived data, such as predicted sequence domains, and functionally coherent sequence subsets (Functional Families or FunFams). The latest CATH+ release, version 4.3, significantly increases coverage of structural and sequence data, with an addition of 65,351 fully-classified domains structures (+15%), providing 500 238 structural domains, and 151 million predicted sequence domains (+59%) assigned to 5481 superfamilies. The FunFam generation pipeline has been re-engineered to cope with the increased influx of data. Three times more sequences are captured in FunFams, with a concomitant increase in functional purity, information content and structural coverage. FunFam expansion increases the structural annotations provided for experimental GO terms (+59%). We also present CATH-FunVar web-pages displaying variations in protein sequences and their proximity to known or predicted functional sites. We present two case studies (1) putative cancer drivers and (2) SARS-CoV-2 proteins. Finally, we have improved links to and from CATH including SCOP, InterPro, Aquaria and 2DProt.

Subfields: Biophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8f36a3da7526b3d022c418ba89c42822c6652188

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biophysics

  1. Michael Heinzinger
  2. Junzhou Huang
  3. Erik Nijkamp
  4. Tao Shen
  5. Jiaxiang Wu
  6. Yatao Bian
  7. Haidong Lan
  8. Zak Costello

Citations in the corpus