Protein threading using context-specific alignment potential

By Jianzhu Ma, Sheng Wang, Feng Zhao, Jinbo Xu. 2013

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Motivation: Template-based modeling, including homology modeling and protein threading, is the most reliable method for protein 3D structure prediction. However, alignment errors and template selection are still the main bottleneck for current template-base modeling methods, especially when proteins under consideration are distantly related. Results: We present a novel context-specific alignment potential for protein threading, including alignment and template selection. Our alignment potential measures the log-odds ratio of one alignment being generated from two related proteins to being generated from two unrelated proteins, by integrating both local and global context-specific information. The local alignment potential quantifies how well one sequence residue can be aligned to one template residue based on context-specific information of the residues. The global alignment potential quantifies how well two sequence residues can be placed into two template positions at a given distance, again based on context-specific information. By accounting for correlation among a variety of protein features and making use of context-specific information, our alignment potential is much more sensitive than the widely used context-independent or profile-based scoring function. Experimental results confirm that our method generates significantly better alignments and threading results than the best profile-based methods on several large benchmarks. Our method works particularly well for distantly related proteins or proteins with sparse sequence profiles because of the effective integration of context-specific, structure and global information. Availability: http://raptorx.uchicago.edu/download/. Contact: jinboxu@gmail.com

Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Materials Chemistry

  1. Jinbo Xu
  2. Sheng Wang
  3. Jianzhu Ma
  4. Lukasz Kurgan
  5. Ali Hassan Ahmed Maghrabi
  6. Zhiyong Wang
  7. Ahmad N. Shuid
  8. Vladimir N Uversky

In Molecular Biology

  1. Jinbo Xu
  2. Sheng Wang
  3. Lukasz Kurgan
  4. Jianzhu Ma
  5. Vladimir N Uversky
  6. Shiwang Liu
  7. Zhiyong Wang
  8. Ahmad N. Shuid

Citations in the corpus