On the computation and reduction of the peak-to-average power ratio in multicarrier communications
By Vahid Tarokh, Hamid Jafarkhani. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 2000
327 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8eef1b62b6a0378c329d4196f409fdede42ed636
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Pramod Viswanath
- David Tse
- David D. Falconer
- Stefan H. Müller-Weinfurtner
- Anader Benyamin-Seeyar
- Seshadri Mohan
- Tao Jiang
- Yasir Rahmatallah
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Pramod Viswanath
- Seshadri Mohan
- Yasir Rahmatallah
- Tao Jiang
- Yiyan Wu
- David Tse
- David D. Falconer
- Stefan H. Müller-Weinfurtner
Citations in the corpus
- Peak-To-Average Power Ratio Reduction in OFDM Systems: A Survey And Taxonomy (2013, background): “A major disadvantage that arises in multicarrier systems like OFDM is the resulting non-constant envelope with high peaks [27].”
- Frequency domain equalization for single-carrier broadband wireless systems (2002, methodology): “While there are signal processing methods to reduce this ratio [Cim00], [Tar00], [Van00], the transmitter power amplifier in a OFDM system generally must be backed off several dB more than that of a single carrier system [Str01] to remain linear over the range of peaks that must be faithfully…”
- PAPR reduction of OFDM signals using a reduced complexity PTS technique (2004, background): “While block coding reduces PAPR, it also reduces transmission rate, significantly so for a large number of subcarriers [5].”
- Fundamentals of Wireless Communication (2005, background): “This reading exercise takes you through [63, 115] and introduces these developments.”
- An Overview: Peak-to-Average Power Ratio Reduction Techniques for OFDM Signals (2008, methodology): “Moreover, various approaches also have been proposed to reduce the PAPR including clipping [11]–[14], coding schemes [15]–[21], phase optimization [22], [23], nonlinear companding transforms [24]–[29], Tone Reservation (TR) and Tone Injection (TI) [30], [31], constellation shaping [32]–[34], Partial”
- SLM peak-power reduction without explicit side information (2001, methodology): “In [3], an optimized set of subcarrier phase rotations for systems with binary phase-shift keying is presented to lower the ultimate PAR.”