Interjurisdictional Sorting and Majority Rule: An Empirical Analysis

224 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Good Principals or Good Peers? Parental Valuation of School Characteristics, Tiebout Equilibrium, and the Incentive Effects of Competition among Jurisdictions (2006, methodology): “, Dennis Epple et al. (2001), Epple and Holger Sieg (1999), and Raquel Fernandez and Richard Rogerson (1996, 1997).”
Estimating the Effects of Private School Vouchers in Multidistrict Economies (2007, background): “In equilibrium, no household wishes to move, switch to a different school, or vote differently.”
Admission, Tuition, and Financial Aid Policies in the Market for Higher Education (2006, background): “5Recent studies include Berry, Levinsohn, and Pakes (1995),Epple, Romer, and Sieg (2001), Nevo (2001), Petrin (2002), Bajari and Benkard (2002), Blundell, Browning, and Crawford.”
Crossing boundaries and borders: Regional science advances in migration modelling (2003, background): “Empirical estimates of the implications of fiscal competition remain rather rare, although Pogodzinski and Sass (1994) and Epple et al. (2001) provide important examples.”