Measuring community responses to large‐scale disturbance in conservation biogeography

108 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Natural disturbance impacts on ecosystem services and biodiversity in temperate and boreal forests (2015, unknown): “Generalist species might, for instance, benefit strongly from disturbance events while specialists and late-seral species – which are often a priority for conservation – could be negatively affected (Devictor & Robert, 2009).”
Toward more concern for specialisation and less for species diversity in conserving farmland biodiversity (2010, background): “In this context, taking into account to a wider extent ecological difference among species would be a simple way to estimate community response to disturbances (Devictor and Robert, 2008) such as intensive farming practices.”
Rise of the generalists: evidence for climate driven homogenization in avian communities (2012, background): “As such, our observed increase in diversity over a period of recent warming is 401 likely to be transient (Walther et al., 2002; Devictor & Robert, 2009).”
Defining and measuring ecological specialization (2010, background): “This indicator has been shown to be powerful and robust in reflecting community response to spatial and temporal disturbance (Devictor & Robert 2009).”
Beyond the Fragmentation Threshold Hypothesis: Regime Shifts in Biodiversity Across Fragmented Landscapes (2010, unknown): “species can often provide a more sensitive and robust method of measuring human impacts in natural systems [48,49].”