Nanoparticle analysis and characterization methodologies in environmental risk assessment of engineered nanoparticles

By M. Hassellöv, J. Readman, J. Ranville, Karen Tiede. Ecotoxicology, 2008

633 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Microplastics in freshwater and terrestrial environments: Evaluating the current understanding to identify the knowledge gaps and future research priorities. (2017, background): “436 Efforts in colloid science and nanotoxicology have shown the value of working towards 437 standard methods for key measurements of colloid and nanomaterial characteristics, such as size, 438 stability and surface properties (Hassellov et al., 2008; Montes-Burgos et al., 2009).”
In vitro antifungal efficacy of copper nanoparticles against selected crop pathogenic fungi (2014, neutral): “The differences can be mainly explained by the bias from each specific method [31].”
Silver nanoparticles: behaviour and effects in the aquatic environment. (2011, methodology): “A multi-method approach, combining sophisticated methods such as hyphenated FlFFF-ICPMS (flow field-flow fraction and inductively coupled plasma spectrometry) (Hassellov et al., 2008) and electron microscopy (Kaegi et al.”