MODELLING THE EMERGENCE RESPONSE OF WEED SEEDS TO BURIAL DEPTH: INTERACTIONS WITH SEED DENSITY, WEIGHT AND SHAPE

By A. Grundy, Andrew Mead, S. Burston. 2003

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The functional role of soil seed banks in natural communities. (2014, background): “…Poschlod et al., 1998), different seasons (Roberts, 1986; Poschlod and Jackel, 1993; Milberg and Andersson, 1997), at different depths (Duvel, 1902; Grundy et al., 2003; Benvenuti, 2007), in different quantities (Thompson and Grime, 1979; Thompson et al., 1997) and in different states of dormancy…”
The natural history of soil seed banks of arable land (2006, background): “2003), dormancy cycling (Vleeshouwers and Boumeester 2001), changes in sensitivity of seeds to water potential (Batlla and Benech-Arnold 2004) and light (Batlla and Benech-Arnold 2005) as dormancy break occurs, and effects of seed density, weight, and shape on emergence from soil (Grundy et al. 2003”
Influence of glyphosate-resistant cropping systems on weed species shifts and glyphosate-resistant weed populations (2009, background): “Tillage practices including the type of tillage implements used contribute to weed shifts by differential movement of seeds to soil burial depths more or less suited for specific germination and emergence requirements (Grundy et al., 2003).”
Germination, persistence, and emergence of flaxleaf fleabane (Conyza bonariensis [L.] Cronquist) (2007, background): “bonariensis seeds are very small in size and the amount of substrate required for emergence by small seeds from burial depths > 1 cm is minimal (Grundy et al. 2003).”