Paraconsistent Logic

By David Ripley. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2015

394 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8e7c75ca62c6c57ab4a98f411044da1a9563f225

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Jessica Taylor
2. Tsvi Benson-Tilsen
3. Scott Garrabrant
4. Graham Priest
5. Nate Soares
6. Andrew Critch
7. Tom Everitt
8. Marcus Hutter

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

1. Tsvi Benson-Tilsen
2. Graham Priest
3. Jessica Taylor
4. Nate Soares
5. Scott Garrabrant
6. Tom Everitt

Citations in the corpus

• One: Being an Investigation into the Unity of Reality and of its Parts, including the Singular Object which is Nothingness (2014, background): “See Priest (1987), ch. 3, and Priest (2002), pp. 358–65. being and nothing 55 quite generally, contradiction is obviously not a particular problem in the present context.”
• Logical Induction (2016, background): “…theory (Rantala 1979; Hintikka 1979; Bacharach 1994; Lipman 1991; Battigalli and Bonanno 1999; Binmore 1992), paraconsistent logic (Blair and Subrahmanian 1989; Priest 2002; Mortensen 2013; Fuhrmann 2013; Akama and Costa 2016) and fuzzy logic (Klir and Yuan 1995; Yen and Langari 1999; Gerla 2013).”