Smooth minimization of non-smooth functions
By Yurii E. Nesterov. 2005
2,956 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computational Mechanics, Numerical Analysis, Optimization & Training, Mathematical Optimization
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Peter Richtárik
- Michael I. Jordan
- Martin Jaggi
- Francis R. Bach
- Simon Lacoste-Julien
- Dacheng Tao
- Yoshua Bengio
- Sergey Levine
In Computational Mechanics
- Peter Richtárik
- Francis R. Bach
- Martin Jaggi
- Jakub Konecný
- Tong Zhang
- Wotao Yin
- Michael I. Jordan
- Simon Lacoste-Julien
In Numerical Analysis
- Francis R. Bach
- Guanghui Lan
- Michael I. Jordan
- Simon Lacoste-Julien
- Peter Richtárik
- Martin Jaggi
- Thomas Pock
- Stephen P. Boyd
In Optimization & Training
- Peter Richtárik
- Simon Lacoste-Julien
- Francis R. Bach
- Martin Jaggi
- Jakub Konecný
- Sebastian U. Stich
- Michael I. Jordan
- Nicolas Loizou
In Mathematical Optimization
- Francis R. Bach
- Julien Mairal
- Martin Jaggi
- Michael I. Jordan
- Zeyuan Allen-Zhu
- Tong Zhang
- Martin J. Wainwright
- Guanghui Lan
Citations in the corpus
- Privacy Amplification by Iteration (2018, methodology): “While smoothing a non-smooth objective is a standard technique in optimization (e.g., see [Nes05, DBW12]) we are not aware of bounds that are stated in the form we need.”
- Deep learning with Elastic Averaging SGD (2014, methodology): “It is based on the Nesterov’s momentum scheme Nesterov (2005); Lan (2012); Sutskever et al. (2013), where the update of the local worker of the form captured in Equation 4 is replaced by the following update , where δ is the momentum term.”
- Better Mini-Batch Algorithms via Accelerated Gradient Methods (2011, background): “Recently, [10] has shown that a mini-batching distributed framework is capable of attaining asymptotically optimal speed-up in general (see also [1]).”
- Optimal Distributed Online Prediction Using Mini-Batches (2010, background): “…7 implies that If ∇ F ( w ⋆ ) = 0 (this is certainly the case if W is the whole space), then we have Then the expected regret bound can be simplified as To prove Theorem 7 we require the following fundamental lemma, which can be found, for example, in Nesterov (2005), Tseng (2008) and Xiao (2010).”
- How To Make the Gradients Small Stochastically: Even Faster Convex and Nonconvex SGD (2018, background): “Nesterov’s Second Trick: AGD After Regularization.”
- CoCoA: A General Framework for Communication-Efficient Distributed Optimization (2016, methodology): “The proposed technique is a significant improvement over simple smoothing techniques used in, e.g., Nesterov (2005); Shalev-Shwartz and Zhang (2014); and Zhang and Lin (2015) that enforce strong convexity by adding a small L 2 term to the objective.”
- Best Subset Selection via a Modern Optimization Lens (2015, positive): “Observing that g1(β) = sup‖w‖∞≤1〈y − Xβ,w〉 we make use of the smoothing technique of Nesterov (2005) to obtain g1(β; τ) = sup‖w‖∞≤1(〈y − Xβ,w〉− τ2‖w‖22). g1(β; τ) is a smooth approximation of g1(β), with = λmax(X′X)/τ and our algorithmic framework applies.”
- Boosting the Actor with Dual Critic (2017, positive): “We then rewrite the optimization min V max α ∈P ( S ) ,π ∈P ( A ) L r ( V, α, π ) as min V max α ∈P ( S ) ,π ∈P ( A ) L k ( V, α, π ) due to the well-known one-to-one correspondence between regularization η V and (cid:15) Nesterov (2005).”
- Smoothed Dual Embedding Control (2017, methodology): “ithm is related to the reinforcement learning with entropy-regularized MDP model. Dierent from the motivation in our method where the entropy regularization is introduced in dual form for smoothing (Nesterov, 2005), the entropy-regularized MDP has been proposed for balancing exploration and exploita”
- Communication Complexity of Distributed Convex Learning and Optimization (2015, background): “[15, 24]), can match these lower bounds up to log factors2.”
- Solving variational inequalities with Stochastic Mirror-Prox algorithm (2008, methodology): “Starting with the breakthrough paper of Nesterov [11], this phenomenon, in its general form, is utilized in the fastest known so far first order algorithms for “well-structured” nonsmooth convex programs.”
- Breaking the Curse of Dimensionality with Convex Neural Networks (2014, methodology): “per, in our theoretical results, we consider non-smooth loss functions for which conditional gradient algorithms do not converge in general. One possibility is to smooth the loss function, as done by Nesterov (2005): an approximation error of ε may be obtained with a smoothness constant proportional”
- DAGs with NO TEARS: Continuous Optimization for Structure Learning (2018, methodology): “Off-the-shelf techniques such as Nesterov’s smoothing (Nesterov, 2005) could be useful, however more thorough investigation is left for future work.”
- Fundamental Limits of Online and Distributed Algorithms for Statistical Learning and Estimation (2013, background): “The following theorem is a corollary of Thm. 2, and we provide a proof in Appendix A.4.”
- A simpler approach to obtaining an O(1/t) convergence rate for the projected stochastic subgradient method (2012, methodology): “– We note that the averaging of linear approximations of f (rather than the iterates) by t + 1 is also used in the optimization strategy of Nesterov [8], which achieves an optimal O(1/t2) convergence rate for optimizing (deterministic) objectives with Lipschitz-continuous gradients (see step 3 for t”
- Tight Complexity Bounds for Optimizing Composite Objectives (2016, neutral): “Let f be convex and LLipschitz continuous.”
- Fast Distributed Gradient Methods (2011, methodology): “ngly convex. Examples of f i()’s include quadratic or logistic losses regularized by a quadratic or smooth approximation to the l 1 norm–like y7! P d i=1 p y2 + 2 or y7! P d i=1 log e yi=+ 2 , [25]. We design two fast distributed gradient algorithms, a diminishing step size k = c=k;c>0, and a c”
- Optimization with Sparsity-Inducing Penalties (2011, neutral): “, [25, 88, 91]).”