Earthquake Fault Scaling: Self‐Consistent Relating of Rupture Length, Width, Average Displacement, and Moment Release

685 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Earthquake Surface Slip-Length Data is Fit by Constant Stress Drop and is Useful for Seismic Hazard Analysis (2013, background): “This slip occurs mainly as long-period motion, with a dearth of high frequencies (Shaw andWesnousky, 2008), and thus occurs in moment and magnitude estimates, but not necessarily in that of shaking.”
Dispersion of tsunamis: does it really matter? (2013, methodology): “Løvholt et al. (2008) started with the near field solution of Gisler et al.”
A seismologically consistent expression for the total area and volume of earthquake‐triggered landsliding (2016, background): “The most up to date scaling relation between L and Mo [Leonard, 2010] states that L = ( Mo 𝜇C3∕21 C2 )2∕5 (7) with 𝜇 the shear modulus, assumed to be 33 GPa and C1 = 16.5 m1∕3 and C2 = 3.7.10−5 constants derived empirically from many earthquakes [Leonard, 2010].”