Response of Soybean Yield Components to Management System and Planting Date

177 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Soybean Sowing Date: The Vegetative, Reproductive, and Agronomic Impacts (2008, methodology): “…(1987), in Illinois by Beaver and Johnson (1981) and by Anderson and Vasilas (1985), in Iowa by Schnebly and Fehr (1993), in Wisconsin by Oplinger and Philbrook (1992) and by Pedersen and Lauer (2003, 2004a, 2004b), in North Dakota by Helms et al. (1990), and in Nebraska by Elmore (1990).”
Physiological and management factors contributing to soybean potential yield (2015, background): “Similarly, a reduction in massseed results in greater pods and seed m−2 (Bruening and Egli, 1999; Pedersen and Lauer, 2004; Woodward and Begg, 1976).”
Growth, Yield, and Yield Component Changes among Old and New Soybean Cultivars (2009, background): “Pedersen and Lauer (2004) found HI to be positively correlated with yield and this agrees with Shibles and Weber (1966), but does not agree with the negative association (Board and Modali, 2005) or no association (Cregan and Yaklich, 1986) between HI and yield.”
Genetic gain × management interactions in soybean: I. Planting date (2013, background): “, 2009), and decreased seeds per unit area (Pedersen and Lauer, 2004), all leading to lower yields.”