Principles of Political Economy: With Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy
By J. Mill. 2000
387 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8e4cf76b2c9f1cc01e7d2c3b6fa1cf4912bcc49a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Ryan Cotterell
- Adina Williams
- Zeerak Talat
- Hagen Blix
- Vasilis Kostakis
- Richard P. F. Holt
- Alex Pazaitis
- Josef Valvoda
Citations in the corpus
- The changing face of mainstream economics (2004, background): “In his writings John Stuart Mill gave up the wage fund doctrine, but retained it in his principles book, stating that these new developments ‘are not yet ripe for incorporation in a general treatise on Political Economy’ (Mill, 1929, p. xxxi) Economists considered heterodox often find it difficult t”
- Entrepreneurs and Evolutionary Biology: The Relationship between Testosterone and New Venture Creation. (2006, unknown): “But most definitions include elements of risk-taking (McClelland, 1961; Mill, 1848; Stewart & Roth, 2001) and/or innovation (Carland, Hoy, Boulton, & Carland, 1984; Carland et al.”
- Currency unions in prospect and retrospect (2010, unknown): “For a thorough analysis, see Japelli & Pagano (2008) and the comprehensive survey by Lane (2006).”
- Peer to Peer: The Commons Manifesto (2019, background): “It was not until the classical political economists and under the influence of established capitalist institutions that elements like a ‘natural’ order (Smith, 1776), scarcity (Ricardo, 1821) and command of possession (Mill, 1848) were associated with commodity exchange.”
- On the Machine Learning of Ethical Judgments from Natural Language (2022, background): “John Stuart Mill (1871) put it succinctly: It often happens that the universal belief of one age of mankind [sic]—a belief from which no one was, nor without an extraordinary effort of genius and courage, could at that time be free— becomes to a subsequent age so palpable an absurdity, that the…”
- Sustainability economics: Where do we stand? (2008, background): “However the importance of land as a resource was recognized as primary by the French physiocrats , and again by Malthus (Malthus, 1946) in the 18th century and by John Stuart Mill in the 19th century (Mill, 1848).”