Speaker adaptation of neural network acoustic models using i-vectors
By George Saon, Hagen Soltau, David Nahamoo, Michael A. Picheny. 2013
679 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Speech & Audio, Signal Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Speech & Audio
- Jinyu Li
- Shinji Watanabe
- Dong Yu
- Wei-Ning Hsu
- Yu Zhang
- Tara N. Sainath
- James R. Glass
- Gabriel Synnaeve
In Signal Processing
Citations in the corpus
- ContextNet: Improving Convolutional Neural Networks for Automatic Speech Recognition with Global Context (2020, background): “Previous works on hybrid ASR have successfully introduced the context to acoustic models by either stacking a large number of layers, or having a separately trained global vector to represent the speaker and the environment information [13, 14, 15, 16].”
- Wav2Letter: an End-to-End ConvNet-based Speech Recognition System (2016, methodology): “xtend this training pipeline. The current state of the art on Librispeech (the dataset that we used for our evaluations) uses this approach too [18, 20], with an additional step of speaker adaptation [22, 19]. Recently, [23] proposed GMM-free training, but the approach still requires to generate a f”
- Personalization of End-to-End Speech Recognition on Mobile Devices for Named Entities (2019, background): “There are existing speaker adaptation techniques for neural networks that offer a more compact model representation by having a large number of global parameters shared across different speakers and a smaller number of speaker-specific parameters [13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20].”
- Deep Learning: Methods and Applications (2014, neutral): “, 2013b), IBM (Sainath et al., 2011, 2013, 2013b; Kingsbury et al., 2012; Saon et al., 2013), Google (Jaitly et al.”
- Achieving Human Parity in Conversational Speech Recognition (2016, methodology): “Speaker adaptive modeling in our system is based on conditioning the network on an i-vector [49] characterization of each speaker [50, 51].”
- Letter-Based Speech Recognition with Gated ConvNets (2017, background): “The current state of the art on LibriSpeech belongs to this approach too (Panayotov et al., 2015; Peddinti et al., 2015b), with an additional step of speaker adaptation (Saon et al., 2013; Peddinti et al., 2015a).”
- The microsoft 2016 conversational speech recognition system (2016, methodology): “Compared to the networks used previously in image recognition, this network uses small (3x3) filters, is deeper, and applies up to five convolutional layers before pooling.”
- The CAPIO 2017 Conversational Speech Recognition System (2017, background): “, i-vectors [11] in case of speaker adaptation) for a better feature transformation [12, 13, 14].”
- Extracting Domain Invariant Features by Unsupervised Learning for Robust Automatic Speech Recognition (2018, methodology): “We apply the same procedure as i-vector based speaker adaptation [27]: For each utterance, we first estimate its s-vector, and then concatenate s-vectors with the feature representation of each frame to generate the new feature sequence.”
- Exploring Machine Speech Chain for Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Speaker Adaptation (2021, methodology): “In ASR, speaker adaptation techniques can be divided into three categories [11], namely model retraining [12, 13], feature transformation [14, 15] and auxiliary feature-based adaptation [16, 11].”
- Joint training of convolutional and non-convolutional neural networks (2014, methodology): “The I-Vectors were generated exactly the same way as described in [18].”
- A study on data augmentation of reverberant speech for robust speech recognition (2017, methodology): “We use 40-dimensional MFCCs and 100 dimensional i-vectors [21].”
- Invariant Representations for Noisy Speech Recognition (2016, methodology): “Several model and feature based adaptation methods such as Maximum Likelihood Linear Regression (MLLR), feature-based MLLR and iVectors (Saon et al. , 2013) have been proposed to handle speaker variability; and Noise Adaptive Training (NAT; Kalinli et al. , 2010) and Vector Taylor Series (VTS; Un…”
- Factorized Hidden Layer Adaptation for Deep Neural Network Based Acoustic Modeling (2016, background): “Techniques like i-vectors [12], [13], [61], [62] and bottleneck features [63]–[65] are commonly used as speaker features.”
- The Microsoft 2017 Conversational Speech Recognition System (2017, methodology): “Speaker adaptive modeling in our system is based on conditioning the network on an i-vector [37] characterization of each speaker [38, 39].”
- Recent progresses in deep learning based acoustic models (2017, methodology): “One popular method in this category is the use of auxiliary features, such as i-vector [106], [107], speaker code [108] , and noise estimate [109] which are concatenated with the standard acoustic features.”
- Hierarchical Bayesian combination of plug-in maximum a posteriori decoders in deep neural networks-based speech recognition and speaker adaptation (2017, methodology): “…as testified by the great deal of DNN adaptation techniques available in the recent literature, e.g., (Yu et al., 2013; AbdelHamid and Jiang, 2013; Saon et al., 2013; Siniscalchi et al., 2013; Li et al., 2014; Remes et al., 2015; Huang et al., 2015a; Swietojanski et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2017).”