Testing hypotheses in order

By Paul R. Rosenbaum. 2008

72 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8e248e70781be029a52847e0bd92274d0bbc5726

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Jelle J. Goeman
2. Aldo Solari
3. Jesse Hemerik
4. Christina Heinze-Deml

In Statistics and Probability

1. Aldo Solari
2. Jelle J. Goeman
3. Jake Bowers
4. Costas Panagopoulos
5. Mark M. Fredrickson
6. Ben B. Hansen
7. Jesse Hemerik
8. Peter C. Austin

Citations in the corpus

• Machine Learning and Causal Inference : A Modular Approach to Assessing the Effects of the London Bombings of 2005 (2015, background): “Rosenbaum (2008) and Hansen and Sales (2015) provide some examples of how pre-specified plans for hypothesis testing control error-rates even when multiple hypothesis tests are conducted.”
• The Sequential Rejection Principle of Familywise Error Control (2010, methodology): “Partitioning. The closed testing principle of Marcus, Peritz and Gabriel (1976) has been a cornerstone of multiple hypotheses testing for decades.”