Policy Regimes and Policy Change

By Carter A. Wison. Journal of Public Policy, 2000

207 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The politics of sustainability transitions (2016, background): “1075195 Chilvers, J., & Longhurst, N. (2016). Participation in transition(s): Reconceiving public engagements in”
Design Principles for Policy Mixes: Cohesion and Coherence in ‘New Governance Arrangements’ (2007, background): “That is, most existing policy arrangements or regimes have developed incrementally in an ad hoc fashion over a relatively long period of time and contain a wide mix of policy instruments (Wilson, 2000; Evers 2005; Gunningham and Sinclair 1999).”
Toward a processual understanding of policy integration (2016, background): “…intentionally (cf. Bauer and Knill 2012), for example as a result of a collaboration fatigue (Halligan et al. 2011) or because political actors replace existing paradigms, such as joined-up-government, by new ones (Wilson 2000), as has happened in the UK and the Netherlands (Karré et al. 2013).”
Developmental States and Sustainability Transitions: Prospects of a Just Transition in South Africa (2016, background): “…socio-political regime, and draw on the ‘policy regime’ literature to generate a definition that is appropriate for our notion of a just transition (Wilson, 2000).1 Taking as point of departure that a policy regime and a socio-political regime are the same thing,2 following policy regime theory,…”