Organic Agriculture, Food Security, and the Environment
By Eva‐Marie Meemken, M. Qaim. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 2018
428 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Organic agriculture is often perceived as more sustainable than conventional farming. We review the literature on this topic from a global perspective. In terms of environmental and climate change effects, organic farming is less polluting than conventional farming when measured per unit of land but not when measured per unit of output. Organic farming, which currently accounts for only 1% of global agricultural land, is lower yielding on average. Due to higher knowledge requirements, observed yield gaps might further increase if a larger number of farmers would switch to organic practices. Widespread upscaling of organic agriculture would cause additional loss of natural habitats and also entail output price increases, making food less affordable for poor consumers in developing countries. Organic farming is not the paradigm for sustainable agriculture and food security, but smart combinations of organic and conventional methods could contribute toward sustainable productivity increases in global agriculture.
Subfields: Ecology, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8e1e088e866e5e6f59e0a12dc36814564fc026ae
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- The willingness to consume organic food: A review (2021, background): “Notwithstanding, consumers regard organic food produces to be healthier than conventional food produces because of the minimal levels of pesticide residues (Meemken & Qaim, 2018; Saba & Messina, 2003; Watson, 2012; Wier et al., 2008).”