Refined crystal structure of the triphosphate conformation of H‐ras p21 at 1.35 A resolution: implications for the mechanism of GTP hydrolysis.
By E. Pai, U. Krengel, G. Petsko, R. Goody, W. Kabsch, A. Wittinghofer. 1990
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- R. Knihtila
- G. Holzapfel
- K. Weiss
- F. Meilleur
- Carla Mattos
Citations in the corpus
- From Principal Component to Direct Coupling Analysis of Coevolution in Proteins: Low-Eigenvalue Modes are Needed for Structure Prediction (2012, unknown): “Results are compared to PDB entry 5p21 [48].”
- Evolution-Based Functional Decomposition of Proteins (2015, unknown): “The essential characteristics of these proteins are exemplified by the high-resolution atomic structures of both inactive (GDP-bound, PDB 4Q21 (45)) and active (GTP γ S-bound, PDB 5P21 (46)) states of a canonical member of this family, H-Ras.”
- Neutron Crystal Structure of RAS GTPase Puts in Question the Protonation State of the GTP γ-Phosphate* (2015, background): “The crystal form with P3221 symmetry is common among x-ray crystal structures of RAS, used originally to describe the nucleotide-binding site in detail and to formulate hypotheses for the GTP hydrolysis reaction (20).”