Efficacy of statins in familial hypercholesterolaemia: a long term cohort study

By J. Versmissen, Daniëlla M. Oosterveer, M. Yazdanpanah, J. Defesche, D. Basart, A. Liem, J. Heeringa, J. Witteman, P. Lansberg, J. Kastelein and 1 more. British medical journal, 2008

736 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Objective To determine the efficacy of statin treatment on risk of coronary heart disease in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia. Design Cohort study with a mean follow-up of 8.5 years. Setting 27 outpatient lipid clinics. Subjects 2146 patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia without prevalent coronary heart disease before 1 January 1990. Main outcome measures Risk of coronary heart disease in treated and “untreated” (delay in starting statin treatment) patients compared with a Cox regression model in which statin use was a time dependent variable. Results In January 1990, 413 (21%) of the patients had started statin treatment, and during follow-up another 1294 patients (66%) started after a mean delay of 4.3 years. Most patients received simvastatin (n=1167, 33 mg daily) or atorvastatin (n=211, 49 mg daily). We observed an overall risk reduction of 76% (hazard ratio 0.24 (95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.30), P<0.001). In fact, the risk of myocardial infarction in these statin treated patients was not significantly greater than that in an age-matched sample from the general population (hazard ration 1.44 (0.80 to 2.60), P=0.23). Conclusion Lower statin doses than those currently advised reduced the risk of coronary heart disease to a greater extent than anticipated in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia. With statin treatment, such patients no longer have a risk of myocardial infarction significantly different from that of the general population.

Subfields: Cancer Research, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8e0bc4f77b9af4240dc522b8293d7024507602d9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cancer Research

  1. Jan Boren
  2. Marja-Riitta Taskinen
  3. Børge G. Nordestgaard
  4. S. Daniels

In Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

  1. Børge G. Nordestgaard
  2. Jan Boren
  3. A. Tybjærg-Hansen
  4. Marja-Riitta Taskinen
  5. M. Chapman
  6. Alberico L. Catapano
  7. S. Daniels
  8. I. Graham

In Surgery

  1. Jan Boren
  2. A. Tybjærg-Hansen
  3. Børge G. Nordestgaard
  4. M. Chapman
  5. Marja-Riitta Taskinen
  6. Alberico L. Catapano
  7. S. Gidding
  8. I. Graham

Citations in the corpus