Effects of feedback on the overestimated capacity to detect lies and the underestimated ability to tell lies

By E. Elaad. 2003

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8df4d4f0dc61bf28d93551a306fb247d5b1fc849

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Vivian Lai
2. Chenhao Tan

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Vivian Lai
2. Chenhao Tan

In Philosophy

1. Vivian Lai
2. Chenhao Tan

Citations in the corpus

• On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detection (2018, result): “Our results are not exactly aligned with the previous finding that humans tend to overestimate their capacity of detecting lying [20].”
• Who can best catch a liar?: A meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception. (2006, unknown): “Many studies did not include information about sex differences, but when contacted, several authors (Elaad, 2003; Garrido, Masip, & Herrero, 2004; Masip, Garrido, & Herrero, 2003a; Masip, Garrido, & Herrero, 2003b; Hartwig, Granhag, Strömwall, & Andersson, 2004; Hartwig, Granhag, Strömwall, & Vrig,…”