Both Toffoli and controlled-NOT need little help to do universal quantum computing

By Yaoyun Shi. Quantum information & computation, 2002

299 citations recorded by the source corpus.

What additional gates are needed for a set of classical universal gates to do universal quantum computation? We answer this question by proving that any single-qubit real gate suffices, except those that preserve the computational basis. The result of Gottesman and Knill[quant-ph/9807006] implies that any quantum circuit involving only the Controlled-NOT and Hadamard gates can be efficiently simulated by a classical circuit. In contrast, we prove that Controlled-NOT plus any single-qubit real gate that does not preserve the computational basis and is not Hadamard (or its alike) are universal for quantum computing. Previously only a ``generic'' gate, namely a rotation by an angle incommensurate with pi, is known to be sufficient in both problems, if only one single-qubit gate is added.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8de9bdf00be5a63fed58e6624cf693069796749e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Ashley Montanaro
  2. Hans J. Briegel
  3. Barry C. Sanders
  4. Dan E. Browne
  5. Sabre Kais
  6. Zixuan Hu
  7. Yuchen Wang
  8. Nicolas C. Menicucci

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Hans J. Briegel
  2. Barry C. Sanders
  3. Sabre Kais
  4. Zixuan Hu
  5. Yuchen Wang
  6. Dan E. Browne
  7. Daniel Gottesman
  8. Robert Raussendorf

Citations in the corpus