Anelastic convection-driven dynamo benchmarks

By Chris A. Jones, P. Boronski, A. Brun, Gary A. Glatzmaier, T. Gastine, Mark S. Miesch, Johannes Wicht. 2011

160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8dcc0868ca21fbe01dcdfc1b495b799c90835d5e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. N. Nettelmann
2. Ronald Redmer
3. T. Gastine
4. Andreas Becker
5. Johannes Wicht
6. M. French
7. A. Reiners
8. W. Lorenzen

In Molecular Biology

1. T. Gastine
2. Julien Aubert
3. Johannes Wicht
4. N. Nettelmann
5. Ronald Redmer
6. A. Reiners
7. J. Morin
8. R. Yadav

In Oceanography

1. T. Gastine
2. Johannes Wicht
3. Julien Aubert
4. U. Christensen
5. Alexandre Fournier
6. D. Jault

Citations in the corpus

• From solar-like to antisolar differential rotation in cool stars (2013, methodology): “Our numerical models are computed using the anelastic spectral code MagIC (Wicht 2002, GW12) that has been validated against hydrodynamical and dynamo benchmarks (Jones et al. 2011).”
• AB INITIO SIMULATIONS FOR MATERIAL PROPERTIES ALONG THE JUPITER ADIABAT (2012, methodology): “Numerical models for the dynamics in the nonmetallic outer part and in the dynamo region typically assume that heat capacities, the thermal expansion coefficient, and diffusivities are independent of depth (Jones et al. 2011).”
• Scaling regimes in spherical shell rotating convection (2016, methodology): “…1.003 61× 133 3 1× 104 2.47 21.6 0.03 0.638 – – 1.000 1.000 61× 133 4 3× 104 3.39 42.6 0.02 0.481 1.2× 10−1 5.5× 10−2 1.001 1.002 61× 133 5 5× 104 3.88 55.1 0.01 0.420 1.0× 10−1 4.9× 10−2 1.000 1.000 61× 133 6 1× 105 4.71 79.1 0.00 0.361 8.5× 10−2 4.3× 10−2 1.002 1.003 61× 133 7 3× 105 6.38 137.8…”