Gender difference analysis of cortical thickness in healthy young adults with surface-based methods

310 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Anatomically motivated modeling of cortical laminae (2014, methodology): “Surface-basedmethods employ the solution to the Laplace equation to generate one-to-one correspondences between the cortical boundary surfaces (Im et al., 2006) and evenmeasure cortical thickness along the length of the links created by the Laplace profiles (Foster and Zatorre, 2010).”
Sex differences in cortical thickness mapped in 176 healthy individuals between 7 and 87 years of age. (2007, result): “The regional pattern of increased thickness of cortical gray matter in females is similar to the findings reported in independent young adult samples using similar surface-based methods for studying cortical thickness (Luders and others 2006; Im and others 2006).”
Why Are Autism Spectrum Conditions More Prevalent in Males? (2011, unknown): “Lateral fronto-parietal cortex 3 [144,145,147,150,156,161–165]”